For the third year running, I rated each film or show according to my assessment of its quality and my level of enjoyment. The best ones are the ones that have the highest combined rating of quality and enjoyment. You can see these in the graphic below. The best movies I watched this year Oppenheimer Won enough plaudits (including Best Picture) that I won’t waste time extolling it as a movie.

It doesn’t take long watching Survivor to identify good and bad players, or rather, to identify contestants who are more likely to go far in the game. I had some intuitive guesses about why some players were succeeding and others failing, so I decided to try keep track of those factors quantitatively. Hence this post, where I keep an updated list of Survivor seasons I have watched to see if there is any evidence supporting the reasons I believe some Survivor contestants succeed while others fail.

My dissertation focuses on elites’ usage of regions and regional identities to alter public opinion in order to achieve their political preferences. Hence, my delight to discover Rethinking the Mediterranean in the Fulbright Library here in Morocco. It is a book that details how elites and scholars have thought (or more accurately—not thought) about the Mediterranean as a region and a concept over time. It is a useful case study inasmuch as the Mediterranean is certainly a very fixed region in popular conceptions of the world today.

How Severe is the Problem? “Many people are likely to be misinformed, not only inaccurate in their factual beliefs but confident that they are right.” So say Kuklinski and colleagues (2000, p.809); modest enough, but in the same article, they find that most people are misinformed about welfare, crime, the proportion of minorities (see also Wong et al., 2012), and foreign affairs (see also Kull, Ramsay, & Lewis, 2010). Other scholars have observed severe misinformation on issues ranging from the economy (Bartels, 2002) to national debt and tax policy (Flynn et al.

Overview In the Gnostic Gospels, Elaine Pagels sets out to accomplish several things: to give a general overview of the movement, to advance an argument about the diversity of early Christian thought, and to show the ecclesiastical and political ramifications of gnostic versus orthodox belief. An overview of gnosticism is not easy since it was not a unified movement by any means. Pagels finds broad areas of agreement, however, that could be said to characterize the majority of gnostic sects.